Interaction Between Commercial Actors and Non-Profit Organizations Under Conditions of Administrative Pressure
Abstract
This study examines informal financial practices within the Russian music industry in the context of administrative pressure and asymmetric institutional relations. The research focuses on interactions between commercial actors — including recording studios, producers, concert organizers, artist managers, and independent creative entrepreneurs — and non-commercial or quasi-public organizations possessing varying degrees of administrative influence.
Particular attention is paid to situations in which formally voluntary participation in cultural, charitable, social, or patriotic initiatives may acquire characteristics of economic coercion. In such circumstances, financial contributions, sponsorship arrangements, unpaid services, or other forms of support may occur not solely as a result of market-based decision-making, but under conditions of institutional dependency, regulatory vulnerability, reputational pressure, or fear of adverse consequences.
The paper analyzes how weak legal safeguards, blurred boundaries between state-affiliated and non-state actors, and the growing administrative sensitivity of public cultural activity contribute to the emergence of informal financial obligations. The study further explores the effects of these practices on independent participants in the music industry, including economic instability, self-censorship, psychological stress, and reduced professional autonomy.
The research is based on qualitative analysis of publicly available materials, legal frameworks, industry observations, and comparative institutional approaches to cultural governance. The objective of the study is to identify structural mechanisms facilitating informal economic pressure within the creative sector and to assess their implications for independent cultural entrepreneurship in contemporary Russia.
Keywords:
Russian music industry; informal financial practices; administrative pressure; cultural entrepreneurship; non-commercial organizations; creative industries; economic coercion; institutional dependency; independent producers; cultural policy.
Author: Sergei Bunyatov
Independent Researcher
ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2874-3266
DOI: pending
Full Text (PDF)
References
References
1. Ledeneva, A. V. Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
2. Ledeneva, A. V. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
3. Volkov, V. Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
4. North, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
5. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2004, pp. 725–740.
6. Scott, J. C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
7. Bourdieu, P. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
8. Becker, H. S. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
9. Hesmondhalgh, D. The Cultural Industries. London: Sage Publications, 2019.
10. Florida, R. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
11. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 12 января 1996 г. № 7-ФЗ «О некоммерческих организациях».
12. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 9 октября 1992 г. № 3612-1 «Основы законодательства Российской Федерации о культуре».
13. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 26 июля 2006 г. № 135-ФЗ «О защите конкуренции».
14. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 7 февраля 2011 г. № 3-ФЗ «О полиции».
15. Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 3 июля 2016 г. № 226-ФЗ «О войсках национальной гвардии Российской Федерации».
16. Human Rights Watch. World Report 2022: Russia. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2022.
17. Amnesty International. Russian Federation 2022. London: Amnesty International Publications, 2022.
18. Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2022: Russia. Washington, D.C.: Freedom House, 2022.
19. U.S. Department of State. 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Russia. Washington, D.C., 2023.
20. UNESCO. Re|Shaping Policies for Creativity: Addressing Culture as a Global Public Good. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2022.
21. UNCTAD. Creative Economy Outlook 2022. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2022.
22. Yurchak, A. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
23. Gessen, M. The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia. New York: Riverhead Books, 2017.
24. Greene, S. A. Moscow in Movement: Power and Opposition in Putin’s Russia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014.
25. Федеральная служба государственной статистики (Росстат). Официальные статистические данные по сфере культуры и креативных индустрий. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru
26. OECD. Culture Shock: COVID-19 and the Cultural and Creative Sectors. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
27. Open Society Foundations. Culture and Civil Society in Contemporary Eurasia. New York, 2021.
28. European University at St. Petersburg. Research materials on informal governance and Russian institutional practices, accessed 2022.
29. Journal of Cultural Economics. Selected articles on informal cultural markets and institutional dependency, 2018–2022.
30. Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre. Research reports on creative labor precarity and institutional vulnerability, 2021–2022.