Governance Through Uncertainty: Institutional Pressure on Russian Servicemen Refusing Participation in Crimea- and Ukraine-Related Military Operations

Abstract

This article examines the institutional pressure experienced by Russian servicemen who refused participation in military operations associated with Crimea and Ukraine. Drawing upon documented testimonies, migration-related narratives, journalistic materials, and qualitative institutional analysis, the study explores how military refusal gradually transformed from a disciplinary issue into a politically sensitive category connected to loyalty, legitimacy, and state authority in contemporary Russia.
The article argues that refusal cannot be understood exclusively through legal or military frameworks. Following the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the subsequent escalation of the conflict involving Ukraine, military participation increasingly acquired symbolic political meaning associated with patriotism, sovereignty, and national unity. Under such conditions, refusal became institutionally interpreted not merely as procedural disobedience, but as a potential sign of political unreliability and moral deviation from officially sanctioned narratives.
Particular attention is devoted to the mechanisms through which institutional pressure operates. The study demonstrates that coercion frequently functions through uncertainty, administrative ambiguity, reputational vulnerability, psychological destabilization, and anticipatory fear rather than solely through overt repression. Formal disciplinary procedures become intertwined with informal intimidation, symbolic stigmatization, and ideological pressure, producing environments in which visible disagreement is experienced as socially and existentially dangerous.
The article additionally examines the broader consequences of refusal, including migration, exile, identity fragmentation, adaptive self-regulation, and erosion of institutional legitimacy. The findings suggest that contemporary authoritarian systems increasingly govern not only through direct coercion, but through management of psychological conditions shaping how individuals perceive risk, visibility, and political belonging.
Ultimately, the Russian case illustrates how modern centralized governance systems rely upon symbolic management of loyalty and governance through uncertainty as mechanisms of political control.

Keywords:

authoritarian governance; military refusal; Russia; Crimea; Ukraine; institutional pressure; coercion; migration; exile; institutional fear; adaptive self-regulation; military sociology

Author: Ernest Ibragimov

ORCID: 0009-0009-8021-970X

Full Text (PDF)

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, United Kingdom: Verso.
Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? London, United Kingdom: Verso.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Gel’man, V. (2015). Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing post-Soviet regime changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Gessen, M. (2017). The future is history: How totalitarianism reclaimed Russia. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Jonsson, O. (2019). The Russian understanding of war: Blurring the lines between war and peace. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Pomerantsev, P. (2014). Nothing is true and everything is possible: The surreal heart of the new Russia. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Snyder, T. (2017). On tyranny: Twenty lessons from the twentieth century. New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.
Snyder, T. (2018). The road to unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York, NY: Tim Duggan Books.